I know you dont like galacticos dozer, but signing kane is nothing like buying di Maria, Falcao or any other woodward failures.dozer wrote: ↑3 weeks agoCavani may not play all games so we definitely need a centre forward.Sid wrote: ↑3 weeks agoKane tells Tottenham he wants to leave
Manchester United, Manchester City and Chelsea have all been in touch with Kane's representatives
https://www.skysports.com/football/news ... ie-in-wait
I can't see us being genuinely interested having just given Cavani a new deal
Not Kane though. Too expensive. Galactico types. Cost of failure will be massive.
I even think Messi will flop at our club. He probably needs possession football with quick short passing so Pool and City will suit him.
He might be available for free at the end of the season so I'd take him if he gets crazy and wants to join.
He is gold, look at his scoring record.
If we actually want to win a league title, he would be a massive step towards it.
But you dont need to worry, we won't cough up that kind of cash, more likely to sign someone like sancho who is much bigger risk of flopping, and glazers can pocket the money saved on the difference from kane.
I can see him ending up at Chelsea if man city refuse to meet spurs asking price. Which will mean 3rd/4th place fight again from us, with no real effort to close the gap.
I don't think we will ever win another league under the glazer ownership.