Lingard.

Manchester United chat
User avatar
bman2
Legend
Posts: 4592
Joined: 10 years ago

What a fucking farce.
User avatar
Jason
Star Man
Posts: 824
Joined: 10 years ago

He's been fucked around no doubt, but him posting that picture is a dick move.

But it just another example of really bad management from the club, why was he kept in the summer when club were offered decent money for him? And he obviously was never in the plans for the 1st team.
User avatar
JoelfuckingGlazer
Legend
Posts: 4026
Joined: 10 years ago

Aye. Another symptom of the shit show we’ve become.
User avatar
Jason
Star Man
Posts: 824
Joined: 10 years ago

Talk of newcastle taking him on loan.

That deal would be the most united way of doing a deal.

Does no-one at the club think that giving a player, to what will be a major competitor in the market come summer if they stay up and in future windows.

Its so short sighted. Need them relegated to prolong the period before they can properly start to make moves in the market.

It would only be worse if we let West ham have him again, and he goes and gives them the edge in the top 4 race.
User avatar
bman2
Legend
Posts: 4592
Joined: 10 years ago

jason_uk wrote: 2 years ago Talk of newcastle taking him on loan.

That deal would be the most united way of doing a deal.

Does no-one at the club think that giving a player, to what will be a major competitor in the market come summer if they stay up and in future windows.

Its so short sighted. Need them relegated to prolong the period before they can properly start to make moves in the market.

It would only be worse if we let West ham have him again, and he goes and gives them the edge in the top 4 race.
We should sell him ffs and get a few quid in at least. Our squad is a total mess. We've all these players who are going to leave for free or for peanuts, and in the meantime the club won't buy players for positions we need. It's really amazing that we bought Sancho without selling Lingard or Martial. It's not even been proven yet that he's any better than them.
User avatar
Jason
Star Man
Posts: 824
Joined: 10 years ago

bman2 wrote: 2 years ago
jason_uk wrote: 2 years ago Talk of newcastle taking him on loan.

That deal would be the most united way of doing a deal.

Does no-one at the club think that giving a player, to what will be a major competitor in the market come summer if they stay up and in future windows.

Its so short sighted. Need them relegated to prolong the period before they can properly start to make moves in the market.

It would only be worse if we let West ham have him again, and he goes and gives them the edge in the top 4 race.
We should sell him ffs and get a few quid in at least. Our squad is a total mess. We've all these players who are going to leave for free or for peanuts, and in the meantime the club won't buy players for positions we need. It's really amazing that we bought Sancho without selling Lingard or Martial. It's not even been proven yet that he's any better than them.
Id honestly rather keep him than sell him to Newcastle for peanuts.

It raises the question, who the fuck vetoed him leaving for 30mill in the summer?!

Just more evidence of really bad club management.
sheesh
Legend
Posts: 1239
Joined: 8 years ago

jason_uk wrote: 2 years ago
bman2 wrote: 2 years ago
jason_uk wrote: 2 years ago Talk of newcastle taking him on loan.

That deal would be the most united way of doing a deal.

Does no-one at the club think that giving a player, to what will be a major competitor in the market come summer if they stay up and in future windows.

Its so short sighted. Need them relegated to prolong the period before they can properly start to make moves in the market.

It would only be worse if we let West ham have him again, and he goes and gives them the edge in the top 4 race.
We should sell him ffs and get a few quid in at least. Our squad is a total mess. We've all these players who are going to leave for free or for peanuts, and in the meantime the club won't buy players for positions we need. It's really amazing that we bought Sancho without selling Lingard or Martial. It's not even been proven yet that he's any better than them.
Id honestly rather keep him than sell him to Newcastle for peanuts.

It raises the question, who the fuck vetoed him leaving for 30mill in the summer?!

Just more evidence of really bad club management.
Good player, but it's best for him to move. He wouldn't turn them into title challengers, but you'd think he will do alright there.

I thought we might see a couple more outgoings this month, to be honest, and we still might. If they're going to go, we need to sell them, rather than loan them out.
sheesh
Legend
Posts: 1239
Joined: 8 years ago

He's leaving - official
User avatar
JoelfuckingGlazer
Legend
Posts: 4026
Joined: 10 years ago

sheesh wrote: 1 year ago He's leaving - official
Good. Another self entitled, limited twat.
User avatar
FuB
Site Admin
Posts: 2147
Joined: 8 years ago

#lingone

his attitude towards the end, having been little more than a runabouty twat who regularly couldn't finish in a virtually open goal, means he will never be remembered fondly by United fans.
NQAT's official artificial intelligence
Post Reply