Lingard.
He's been fucked around no doubt, but him posting that picture is a dick move.
But it just another example of really bad management from the club, why was he kept in the summer when club were offered decent money for him? And he obviously was never in the plans for the 1st team.
But it just another example of really bad management from the club, why was he kept in the summer when club were offered decent money for him? And he obviously was never in the plans for the 1st team.
- JoelfuckingGlazer
- Legend
- Posts: 4026
- Joined: 10 years ago
Aye. Another symptom of the shit show we’ve become.
Talk of newcastle taking him on loan.
That deal would be the most united way of doing a deal.
Does no-one at the club think that giving a player, to what will be a major competitor in the market come summer if they stay up and in future windows.
Its so short sighted. Need them relegated to prolong the period before they can properly start to make moves in the market.
It would only be worse if we let West ham have him again, and he goes and gives them the edge in the top 4 race.
That deal would be the most united way of doing a deal.
Does no-one at the club think that giving a player, to what will be a major competitor in the market come summer if they stay up and in future windows.
Its so short sighted. Need them relegated to prolong the period before they can properly start to make moves in the market.
It would only be worse if we let West ham have him again, and he goes and gives them the edge in the top 4 race.
We should sell him ffs and get a few quid in at least. Our squad is a total mess. We've all these players who are going to leave for free or for peanuts, and in the meantime the club won't buy players for positions we need. It's really amazing that we bought Sancho without selling Lingard or Martial. It's not even been proven yet that he's any better than them.jason_uk wrote: ↑2 years ago Talk of newcastle taking him on loan.
That deal would be the most united way of doing a deal.
Does no-one at the club think that giving a player, to what will be a major competitor in the market come summer if they stay up and in future windows.
Its so short sighted. Need them relegated to prolong the period before they can properly start to make moves in the market.
It would only be worse if we let West ham have him again, and he goes and gives them the edge in the top 4 race.
Id honestly rather keep him than sell him to Newcastle for peanuts.bman2 wrote: ↑2 years agoWe should sell him ffs and get a few quid in at least. Our squad is a total mess. We've all these players who are going to leave for free or for peanuts, and in the meantime the club won't buy players for positions we need. It's really amazing that we bought Sancho without selling Lingard or Martial. It's not even been proven yet that he's any better than them.jason_uk wrote: ↑2 years ago Talk of newcastle taking him on loan.
That deal would be the most united way of doing a deal.
Does no-one at the club think that giving a player, to what will be a major competitor in the market come summer if they stay up and in future windows.
Its so short sighted. Need them relegated to prolong the period before they can properly start to make moves in the market.
It would only be worse if we let West ham have him again, and he goes and gives them the edge in the top 4 race.
It raises the question, who the fuck vetoed him leaving for 30mill in the summer?!
Just more evidence of really bad club management.
Good player, but it's best for him to move. He wouldn't turn them into title challengers, but you'd think he will do alright there.jason_uk wrote: ↑2 years agoId honestly rather keep him than sell him to Newcastle for peanuts.bman2 wrote: ↑2 years agoWe should sell him ffs and get a few quid in at least. Our squad is a total mess. We've all these players who are going to leave for free or for peanuts, and in the meantime the club won't buy players for positions we need. It's really amazing that we bought Sancho without selling Lingard or Martial. It's not even been proven yet that he's any better than them.jason_uk wrote: ↑2 years ago Talk of newcastle taking him on loan.
That deal would be the most united way of doing a deal.
Does no-one at the club think that giving a player, to what will be a major competitor in the market come summer if they stay up and in future windows.
Its so short sighted. Need them relegated to prolong the period before they can properly start to make moves in the market.
It would only be worse if we let West ham have him again, and he goes and gives them the edge in the top 4 race.
It raises the question, who the fuck vetoed him leaving for 30mill in the summer?!
Just more evidence of really bad club management.
I thought we might see a couple more outgoings this month, to be honest, and we still might. If they're going to go, we need to sell them, rather than loan them out.
- JoelfuckingGlazer
- Legend
- Posts: 4026
- Joined: 10 years ago