This coming from a guy who likes galacticos but then doesn't but then does.....I don't think any of us wish bad on Ole, he's done a good job reversing Mourinho's poison and the team are grinding out results. We have our share of good fortune and Ole is lucky enough to have one of the leagues best players, a genuine worldie. But when things aren't going for us, Ole doesn't have a clue how to change it up from the counter attacking. And it's laughable to suggest he has improved players. Improving players would be like what Klopp has done to Trent or Hendo, or what Poch did for Eriksen and Dele or what Mourinho did to Terry and Lampard. All Ole has done is come in and made it a nicer environment so that the players can enjoy themselves. There is no coaching I can see of, Fred is no better than he was under Mourinho, Shaw is still shite mostly, Matic has regressed. Bruno came this good (and has probably improved Ole), Rasford has more confidence. But none of them have tactically or technically improved under Ole.dozer wrote: ↑1 month agoOle out eh lads?
Tactically naive manager is doing well (so far) again in his third straight season with us.
He's improved Rashford, Shaw, Fred, Matic, Bruno, greenwood and maybe Pogba. Our defenders still need improving.
"I hope Ole succeeds but I think he's tactically naive and lacks big balls"
All these complaints about tactics and strategies are clearly to camouflage the issue that he isn't a galactico manager. I mean, Pool have Klopp, City have Guardiola and we just have Ole. That's the real issue right? He's no where in the league of these managers when it comes to galacticoness.
"Let's see how we perform without Bruno"
reminds me of this gem..
"Can he do it on a wet Tuesday night in Stoke?"
Let's give it a couple of months, I'm sure you will have changed your mind again.