I translated "some clubs" to be any club, football, hockey, cricket any club, that will cost us the least to unloan Sanchez.sheesh wrote: ↑1 year agoOle doesn't seem to know what's happening with Sanchez from one week to the next:
https://www.skysports.com/football/news ... -solskjaer
is satchel much cop
-
- First Teamer
- Posts: 313
- Joined: 1 year ago
- Location: Prescott
I think we should give Sanchez a go as number 10, with Rash, Martial, James ahead of him. He doesn't have to even get near his past best form to be more useful than Pereira, Lingard, or Mata. Inter are only going to give us peanuts anyway, paying a fraction of his wages.
- lkhmffsstopmovingabout
- Legend
- Posts: 5241
- Joined: 7 years ago
probably the club looking to sell and ole does as he’s told if he don’t wanna end up back in the scandi plumbers division
lkhm
hoofing
hoofing
I was up for ditching the highest paid icon of the failed half billion bus parking Jose era. The worst signing in United's history. But losing a 4th player and not replacing em would be dumb.
I know he contributes almost nothing (2 goals last season). But to have someone standing on the pitch in a position is better than having no one stood there. And that's what it's come down to.
So it's shit but we should keep hold of this icon of expensive failure at least until jan, then give his half a mil wages to a couple a decent young players
I know he contributes almost nothing (2 goals last season). But to have someone standing on the pitch in a position is better than having no one stood there. And that's what it's come down to.
So it's shit but we should keep hold of this icon of expensive failure at least until jan, then give his half a mil wages to a couple a decent young players
-
- First Teamer
- Posts: 313
- Joined: 1 year ago
- Location: Prescott
While a part of me sez to dump the SOB regardless of the cost another part is saying that we are going to pay his salary (at least most of it) anyway so keep him here and who know he might yet fit a role.